Jeff
Sauer – the sixth-winningest coach in college history
– writes a bi-weekly column for Inside College Hockey.com.
"The Dean" was the head coach for 31 years at Colorado
College and Wisconsin, where he won two national titles. Sauer
retired at the end of the 2001-02 season. He was the 2003
Snooks Kelley Award winner for contributions to U.S. hockey
and ranked 16th on INCH's list of the all-time greatest
college hockey coaches.
For your
listening pleasure, find The
Bud Song on Wisconsin's official site.
thedean@insidecollegehockey.com
Part
of the fun in doing this column is the opportunity to interact
with you, the hockey fan. Please send your questions or comments
to thedean@insidecollegehockey.com.
January
27, 2004
The Dean's List by Jeff Sauer
Whenever the
National Hockey League's Central Scouting Service releases its mid-season
rankings of the top players eligible for the NHL Entry Draft, it
makes for good readings for fans, coaches and players alike.
This year's
list, which INCH published Jan.
14, also show a trend that is a little scary. Let me explain.
First a little
background: The rankings list North American and European players
separately, as well as separating goalies from forwards and defensemen.
Michigan's Al Montoya is the top-rated North American goaltender,
while North Dakota forward Drew Stafford, at No. 9, leads all college
players on the North American skaters list. Alexander Ovechkin of
Moscow Dynamo is rated the top European player.
College players
make up six of the top 29 players on the North American skaters
list, which ranks 240 skaters and 40 goalies, all playing in the
U.S. and Canada. In addition to college players, the list features
draft-eligible major junior players, as well as a number of college-bound
high school, prep and junior players.
Eight of the
18 collegians in the rankings, including each of the top four, were
born after Sept. 15, 1985, meaning that they would have to "opt-in"
to next summer's draft in order to be selected. Players who have
already enrolled in school forfeit their NCAA eligibility if they
opt in to the draft (college-bound junior players, on the other
hand, can opt in and retain their eligibility).
And that is
the trend that reflects how many things about our game are accelerating.
Players commit to college earlier than ever. And now to get drafted
earlier, they have to make a decision to opt-in to the draft and
give up their college eligibility.
To
Opt or Not?
A number
of current college freshmen – most prominently Drew
Stafford, A.J. Thelen, Wes O'Neill and Adam Pineault –
will be forced to decide this spring whether or not to opt-in
to the 2004 NHL Entry Draft.
Past history
proves that each individual case can lead to different results.
Rick DiPietro opted in to the 2000 draft and was the No. 1
overallpick. But just last year, Michigan's Al Montoya chose
to stay in school, and he's seen his draft stock rise. He's
the top-rated North American goaltender in the Central Scouting
Mid-Term Rankings.
This isn't anything
new. Rick DiPietro did it a few years ago. He gave up his eligibility
at Boston University and the New York Islanders drafted him No.
1. The top four kids in this year's draft will be faced with the
same decision that DiPietro faced – opt-in and see where they
are drafted, or go back to college and see where there draft status
is next year.
I fear this
is a deteriment at all levels. Players who may benefit from more
time in the junior leagues are hurrying to get to college hockey
so they can enhance their draft chances. Thus junior teams are losing
players to colleges.
I understand
why this is happening. Players feel they must play better competition
to improve their chances to play pro hockey. But what these players
don't always realize is they may be better off developing and maturing
in junior hockey before they make the jump to college.
It's similar
to the issue facing the college freshmen this year who have to decide
whether to opt into the pro draft. Sometimes it may be prudent not
to accelerate – instead look at the long-range implications
of a longer college career, which may make for a more well-rounded
player and person.
•
We are about
to hit the stretch drive in both men's and women's college hockey.
I've been fortunate to see four of the top five women's teams in
the country – Minnesota-Duluth, the three-time defending champion;
Minnesota; Wisconsin; and Harvard, and it's obvious the women's
game has made great strides in recent years.
If you haven't
had a chance to catch a women's college game, you should do so.
You'll agree that the game has made great strides. A few years ago,
a team could have two or three great players and they would dominate,
but now people like Krissy Wendell and Natalie Darwitz at Minnesota,
Caroline Ouellette and Jenny Potter at Duluth, and Julie Chu and
Angela Ruggiero at Harvard have helped bring the game along. Other
players have stepped up their games so there is more balance in
the women's game.
It appears the
Frozen Four will be better than ever. Minnesota, Duluth, Ohio State
and Wisconsin look like the best Western teams while Harvard, Dartmouth,
St. Lawrence, Mercyhurst and New Hampshire look like the best in
the East. Minnesota got some bad breaks last week when Darwitz,
the nation's leading scorer, was lost for the year with an elbow
injury and defenseman Lyndsay Wall, an Olympic teammate of Darwitz,
was declared academically ineligible.
This is the
last year the NCAA Tournament will feature four teams. Reflecting
the improved play in women's hockey, the tournament will expand
to eight teams next year. The competition to make it to Providence,
R.I., and the Frozen Four will be fierce. I would encourage any
hockey fan to catch a women's game this season. They will be impressed
at the way the game has come along.